We examine the problem of determining demonstration sufficiency: how can a robot self-assess whether it has received enough demonstrations from an expert to ensure a desired level of performance? To address this problem, we propose a novel self-assessment approach based on Bayesian inverse reinforcement learning and value-at-risk, enabling learning-from-demonstration ("LfD") robots to compute high-confidence bounds on their performance and use these bounds to determine when they have a sufficient number of demonstrations. We propose and evaluate two definitions of sufficiency: (1) normalized expected value difference, which measures regret with respect to the human's unobserved reward function, and (2) percent improvement over a baseline policy. We demonstrate how to formulate high-confidence bounds on both of these metrics. We evaluate our approach in simulation for both discrete and continuous state-space domains and illustrate the feasibility of developing a robotic system that can accurately evaluate demonstration sufficiency. We also show that the robot can utilize active learning in asking for demonstrations from specific states which results in fewer demos needed for the robot to still maintain high confidence in its policy. Finally, via a user study, we show that our approach successfully enables robots to perform at users' desired performance levels, without needing too many or perfectly optimal demonstrations.

Modern civilian and military systems have created a demand for sophisticated intelligent autonomous machines capable of operating in uncertain dynamic environments. Such systems are realizable thanks in large part to major advances in perception and decision-making techniques, which in turn have been propelled forward by modern machine learning tools. However, these newer forms of intelligent autonomy raise questions about when/how communication of the operational intent and assessments of actual vs. supposed capabilities of autonomous agents impact overall performance. This symposium examines the possibilities for enabling intelligent autonomous systems to self-assess and communicate their ability to effectively execute assigned tasks, as well as reason about the overall limits of their competencies and maintain operability within those limits. The symposium brings together researchers working in this burgeoning area of research to share lessons learned, identify major theoretical and practical challenges encountered so far, and potential avenues for future research and real-world applications.